The cyber resilience divide: Will you bounce back or break down?
The impact of a cyberattack goes way beyond the disruption of day-to-day operations – hitting share prices and earnings guidance, exposing businesses to lawsuits and fines, and enforcing budget cuts to divert resources to cyber recovery, reveals Johnny Karam, managing director and vice president, International Emerging Markets at Cohesity
08 July, 2026
TT
16
Defending against a cyberattack can mean the difference between bouncing back or breaking down. For modern organisations, the cost of disruption now extends far beyond operational downtime.
At a time when organisations are operating in an increasingly complex digital threat landscape, resilience is being redefined. It is no longer only about how well systems are protected, but how quickly operations can be restored when disruption occurs, making business continuity a core priority rather than a reactive outcome.
Our research, ‘Risk Ready or Risk-Exposed: The Cyber Resilience Divide’, shows that the impact of a cyberattack goes way beyond the disruption of day-to-day operations – hitting share prices and earnings guidance, exposing businesses to lawsuits and fines, and enforcing budget cuts to divert resources to cyber recovery.
Most organisations recognise just how wide-reaching the consequences of a cyberattack can be. In fact, nearly every organisation we surveyed in the UAE (98 per cent) reported having a cyber resilience strategy in place and almost half 44 per cent said they were confident their strategy could withstand today’s cyber threats. However, moments of disruption act as a real test of these strategies, revealing whether organisations can truly sustain operations and recover quickly when incidents occur.
But is this confidence well-founded?
Here’s the reality: globally just 6 per cent of firms demonstrate peak cyber resilience maturity. The majority of organisations remain underprepared for what happens after a breach – and many underestimate this gap in preparedness.
Interestingly, organisations with the lowest levels of cyber resilience maturity are often the most confident in their preparedness. Around (44 per cent) of less mature organisations believe their strategy requires little or no improvement, while only 37 per cent of mature organisations express the same level of confidence. In fact, 58 per cent of mature organisations acknowledge their strategy still requires improvement, reflecting a more realistic understanding of today’s threat landscape.
This imbalance between perception and preparedness is what turns cyber incidents into business crises. Overconfidence can leave organisations ‘risk exposed’, increasing the likelihood of prolonged disruption and greater damage following cyberattacks.
For the UAE, this confidence gap becomes a business continuity priority rather than strategic exposure. The country’s economic strategy is built on operational stability, service continuity, and digital trust, and as governments and enterprises accelerate AI deployment, cloud-first models, and platform-based services, cyber resilience is no longer an IT outcome, but a core measure of operational reliability and organisational credibility.
True cyber resilience requires a shift in mindset, moving beyond simply protecting backups toward designing recovery environments that are secure, isolated, and verifiably trustworthy before an incident occurs.
Post-attack data recovery remains uncertain for many
Most organisations back up their sensitive data and have basic protection policies in place. However, data protection strategies remain fragmented. While 51 per cent of organisations in the UAE back up sensitive data, only 36 per cent rely on a unified data protection platform, limiting visibility and making response and recovery more complex.
The same pattern appears in post-attack recovery. UAE organisations are taking important steps to secure their backup environments, with 55 per cent now requiring additional authorisation for high-risk administrative actions. This reflects growing focus on protecting backup systems from compromise.
However, security controls alone do not guarantee recoverability. Fewer than half of organisations in the UAE follow the 3-2-1 backup rule (48 per cent), a foundational principle for ensuring clean, reliable recovery. This means that in more than half of environments, recovery copies may not yet be sufficiently isolated, tamper-proof, or verifiably clean.
While many organisations focus on protecting backup systems, fewer are building recovery environments that can confidently restore clean data after a cyberattack.
Threat detection tools get funding, but not full use
UAE organisations have clearly invested in threat detection and investigation. Every organisation surveyed in the UAE reported using structured threat hunting in some form. However, only 21 per cent say they use these capabilities to their full potential, while 79 per cent acknowledge there is still room for improvement.
This highlights a key maturity gap. While detection tools are widely deployed, many organisations have yet to integrate threat hunting into daily security operations or link detection insights directly to response and recovery processes. Without this operational integration, detection capabilities risk becoming reactive monitoring tools rather than proactive defence mechanisms.
Backups not being prioritised according to risk
Another critical observation is that backup strategies are not aligned with actual data risk. While 57 per cent of organisations now use data discovery and classification to identify privacy and security risks and guide response decisions, understanding risk alone is not enough.
Organisations must also prioritise protection and recovery based on data criticality, ensuring that the most important systems and data can be restored first during an incident. When this happens, data risk management moves beyond compliance and becomes a strategic capability that supports business continuity, governance, and long-term digital growth.
The new measure of readiness
Cyber threats will continue to evolve, but leadership expectations must evolve with them. For organisations in the UAE, cyber resilience maturity is increasingly becoming a measure of operational credibility, recovery readiness, and long-term competitiveness.
The organisations that succeed will be those that treat recovery as a strategic discipline, investing in resilience with the same seriousness as growth and demonstrating they can recover quickly when disruption occurs.
Ultimately, the future of cyber resilience in the UAE will be shaped not by who experiences an attack, but by who is prepared to recover from one.




































































